Interview: Adam Rehmeier Speaks Out on the BBFC’s Ban of ‘The Bunny Game’

Posted on November 19, 2011 by Deaditor 13 Comments


Interview by Aled Ll Jones of MovieDromeDVD.com

Editor’s Introduction: Since we first watched The Bunny Game earlier this year in February we’ve become fairly good friends with the film’s director, Adam Rehmeier. We’re big supporters of his independently made artistic vision and in the past have taken the opportunity to speak at length with both Adam and Rodleen on the film’s subject matter. You can read that lengthy interview here, as well as tap into our official review here.

Following the recent ban of The Bunny Game in the UK by the BBFC I’ve conversed with Adam about this decision. Frustration is the best way to summarize everyone’s feeling (both his and ours) regarding this choice. Aled Ll Jones, who has been doing a phenomenal job speaking to many directors in the UK was afforded a few minutes with Adam “on the record” to get his reaction to the ban and discuss the film further.

Currently The Bunny Game’s UK distributor, Trinity X, is considering its next move in attempting to get the ban overturn.

BAH: Could you explain where the origins of The Bunny Game came from, where did you get the idea from?

Adam: The Bunny Game is a monster that manifested itself spontaneously through Rodleen Getsic and myself after many years of collaboration in art, music, and photography. A catalyst of the film was also Rodleen’s real life abduction years prior, though the film is not a re-telling of her experience. Her abduction was an emotional reference point for her character “Bunny” in the film. We spent several years shooting thousands of photos together, and eventually Bunny’s characteristics began to emerge: the bleached hair, the wardrobe, the backpack that held all of her worldly possessions. It was a slow process, nothing was rushed. Even now, after the film has been completed for some time, we are patient as its tentacles slither around searching for proper screening opportunities and appropriate distribution, not wanting it to be easily chalked up as torture porn or a rape film as the BBFC would like you to believe. It is something quite different and unique, and conscious festival programmers in the US and Europe have recognized what the film truly is and have helped get the film before audiences.

BAH: Why did you choose to shoot in Black and White?

Adam: The decision to shoot the film monochromatic really developed during our photo sessions before we began the film. It kept everything primal. Color would possibly have been a distraction and emotionally conveyed something else to the audience. In Black & White, the action becomes the focus. It strips everything down to the basics.

BAH: Given the intense content was casting the film problematic?

Adam: The casting, like everything else in the film, manifested organically and took many years. In the first scenario, Gregg Gilmore played a character named Jonas, who drove around in a van full of puppets and mannequins, sort of a pseudo family. Rodleen’s character was to become an addition to this family, a living breathing fuck doll of sorts, as she was to be unconscious for much of the film. We were set to go to some heavy places, too much so for Gilmore, who ended up backing out of the film in 2006. With the absence of Gilmore, the original film we planned on creating truly died. Jeff Renfro’s audition was really an incident that happened to me on the set of the Polish Bros. film Northfork in 2002. Renfro was the honey wagon driver, and for reasons I’ll never truly know, he attacked me on the sixth day of production. His intensity lingered in my mind for years, so during the point in time where the film was in limbo, he crept back into my consciousness. I had stayed in touch after our incident on Northfork [we were forced to shake hands like gentlemen and became friends] so I called him to see if he was interested in being in the film. After a brief visit, Rodleen and I both knew he was the right man for the film. Jeff knew the film was going to be a challenge. He never took the easy way out. He sucked it up, channeled negativity with us and put his heart into the film. Not bad for a trucker, huh?

BAH: When people lump your film in with the likes of Saw and Hostel is that a little annoying?

Adam: Not only is it annoying, it’s disrespectful to Rodleen’s performance. In The Bunny Game, she went beyond what an actor typically does for the sake of art. There was absolutely nothing comfortable about this production, there were no safety nets. To see someone give so much of her soul to art is quite profound. The BBFC decision to ban the film in the UK is the perfect example of someone chalking this up as just torture and rape. They don’t see what is really going on in the film because they are probably too busy talking over it or taking notes. They don’t understand what an important and cathartic experience this was for Rodleen, how she was able to purge the lingering trauma of her own abduction years prior through this artistic statement. They don’t notice the vacancy in her gaze and realize she has fasted for forty days prior to the shoot to morph her physiology into the desperate creature you see on the screen. They simply chalk it up as snuff.

BAH: What’s the general reaction you’ve had to the film around the festival circuit?

Adam: We’ve had a tremendous response to the film on the festival circuit, but it has been a challenging film to program. Some programmers have been afraid to put it in their line-ups for fear of repercussions from sponsors, but others champion it and bring a nice audience to witness it. We have quite a few more screenings in Europe than the US as of now. There seems to be a greater appreciation for it abroad. We just played to a full house at Lausanne Underground, and there are screenings in Italy and Belgium as well. Programmers that support the film appreciate that it is grounded in reality and doesn’t glorify violence.

BAH: Can you tell me your reaction to the BBFC decision to ban your film outright?

Adam: I think the BBFC decision to ban the film is quite harsh. Of course, they will let remakes of films like I Spit on Your Grave and Last House on the Left pass uncut. Hollywood remakes, nonetheless, that capitalize on the notoriety of rape and revenge of the original films and do absolutely nothing to further the genre. The rape scenes in these films are beyond graphic, and the thought of people sitting around watching this shit on a playback monitor while drinking Starbucks and eating craft service is possibly even more disturbing. I guess unremitting rape and callous behavior is okay with the BBFC as long as the victim exacts revenge on the tormentor, which, in reality, is never the case. The Bunny Game is a journey through several days in the life of a prostitute and is grounded in reality. It is grim and, as with most abductions, the ending is far from happy. The BBFC seems to think that we are eroticising the torture in the film, encouraging the viewer to join in on the abductor’s pleasure. Did they even watch the film? Out of all the screenings we have had in the past year, not a single person has ever expressed that same thought. It is so far from left field, I was certain they were joking when I read it.

BAH: Will this current ban change anything about your directorial and content choices for the future?

Adam: Of course not. I don’t worry about approval when I make a film, especially when it is a personal and intimate story like The Bunny Game. As a director, I make films that interest and challenge me. Not every film I make is going to be similar to The Bunny Game. In fact, my next film, JONAS, is very squeaky clean and PG.

BAH: If somebody asked you to recommend one film to anyone right now what would it be and why? (This isn’t the usual what’s the best film ever made question)

Adam: Everyone needs to see the new Polish Bros. film For Lovers Only. It is beautiful, pure Cinema; my favorite film of the year. Also, I just caught Beyond the Black Rainbow the other night in Lausanne and I was really blown away with it, as well. It’s a wonderful, brooding, Sci-Fi journey.

13 comments

  • Pooch says:

    Rehmeier says: “Of course, they will let remakes of films like I Spit on Your Grave and Last House on the Left pass uncut.” What a shame Adam can’t get his facts straight! He doesn’t realise that both films were heavily cut in the UK by the BBFC. Only in the USA, were both films shown and released uncensored!

    • Pooch says:

      Oh, and the finger gesture photo – how very adult of you both! That’s a real mature attitude to take, when you’re desperately trying to get your work seen in the UK by an adult audience!

    • UK Editor says:

      He’s referring to the remakes of those films. Yes, I Spit On Your Grave was censored by 43 seconds, but Last House On the Left was passed with no cuts. The original Last House on the Left is also now available uncut in the UK. Only the original I Spit On Your Grave remains heavily censored; but, once again, that wasn’t the film Adam Rehmeier was referring to.

      Please don’t talk about facts when you can’t get your own straight, or even bother to properly read what you’re commenting on.

  • Annie says:

    Thank you, Ben.

    Oh, and by the way – the above photo was taken at the Arizona Underground Film Festival, where Rodleen and Adam were doing this called: “having fun.” It had nothing to do with the BBFC ban.

    • Annie says:

      *this THING called “having fun.” gah, fucking typos.

    • Deaditor says:

      That’s right Annie – That photo it had nothing to do with the BBFC ban when it was taken, and it was an editorial choice on my part to use that photo because 1. It’s a great photo of Adam and Rodleen, and epitomizes the essence of how they approach art. Adam has always been clear this film was made for them (meaning himself and Rodleen) first, and if you like it then fine, if you don’t then fine. But it’s not for you. 2: I, as the editor of this web magazine feel that the BBFC and anyone else who feels that they should censor art should be flipped off. Why shouldn’t that be considered an appropriate reaction? What should the proper response from an artist be, after being told they can’t have their film played, or need to hack up their vision so it’s “passable”? Fuck polite society, because when has society ever been truly polite?

  • Cliff Evans says:

    When the issue seems to be whether or not this film is just an exercise in gratuitous shock, it’s a bit disingenuous to flip off the camera and then complain that you aren’t getting taken seriously. I’d argue that they aren’t letting the movie do enough speaking for itself – talking at length about what Rodleen put herself through and how the man playing the trucker wasn’t an actor (and how he attacked the director) just detracts from the movie. It smacks of the sort of hype you’d associate with an exploitation film.

    • Deaditor says:

      @Cliff – you’re putting the chicken before the egg. The middle finger represents a reaction to the calling, not the other way around. I’m assuming you have NOT seen the film?

      P.S. @Annie – I talked to Adam. He agrees – although I used the photo completely out of context, he agrees with my call to have used it.

      To everyone who reads these comments: I’m not going to apologize for that photo and neither will Adam or Rodleen. If you support censorship – in any form – then you deserve the finger. Who cares if The Bunny Game is total exploitation (which it is not)? Does that make censorship any more valid? No. Shouldn’t an audience get to make those choices, and not your government? Seriously – open your eyes people.

  • Annie says:

    They flipped off the camera because they were screwing around, having fun amongst friends. You know, Like normal people do? To make assumptions about a film you haven’t seen and people you don’t know is also disingenuous and smacks of condescension.

  • Cliff Evans says:

    When the picture was taken is irrelevant. What I’m talking about is the choice to make this image the public face associated with the film.

    I haven’t seen it, and I’m not sure I want or need to. But that’s irrelevant too. I’m certainly not pro-censorship. Even if I choose not to see it (and I honestly haven’t decided), I’m glad it’s out there. It looks like it’s going to be creepy and disturbing as fuck, and given how it got made, it’s going to inspire argument and debate, and that’s awesome. It seems provocative and risky, and I’m on board with that.

    I don’t have a problem with the movie. I don’t have a problem with the picture. I’m just trying to point out that if you’re concerned about a movie getting taken seriously and not dismissed as torture porn, then maybe the image you want to represent you as filmmakers shouldn’t be you flipping off the camera.

    Accusing me of being condescending and pro-censorship (really?) because I was critical about a movie? Come on.

    • Deaditor says:

      Hey – don’t say you didn’t ask for it. I’m just simply asking again – put yourself on the other side of the table, and ask yourself what the appropriate reaction to having your film banned by the BBFC should be? Should Adam have donned the white gloves and challenged them to a duel? Or simply smiled and taken the reaction lying down while cursing under his breath? I mean seriously – a bunch of prudes just shit on his film while giving The Human Centipede a pass. I think if the BBFC wants to be taken seriously maybe they need to stop making these kinds of decisions. Hollywood eventually quit taking the Hays Code seriously, and you know what? It went away. Sure, we still have the MPAA, but we also have an X rating. Film at least can be seen if properly classified. Not that I’m a fan of the MPAA.

      So, yeah – fuck the BBFC.

  • Keri says:

    Err, unless I’m missing something here, the photo has nothing to do with the film’s reception or its BBFC ban. It’s a tongue-in-cheek photo which happens to have been posted alongside an article because Marc put it there. If you don’t like the picture, that’s fine. But don’t confuse it with a publicity photo for an anti-ban campaign, because no one has said that, and in fact Marc has corrected that assumption (see above).

  • Annie says:

    Keri, pragmatism is SO last year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

DMCA.com Protection Status
%d bloggers like this: