Also, if you go here :http://www.flickr.com/photos/slashanddine there are more cooking pictures that don’t make it on the column for space reasons, and I have a couple were I show which ways to cut the leeks.

Like I said, I do think Jackie Earle Haley was the best part of this movie, however Kyle Gallner may have been the best of the worst, but I still think his acting was bad at points.

To me the origional face looked more believable. I feel the new one looked over fussed with and kinda weird. Freddy’s face is a staple to what these movies have been. When you see that face you know who it is, changing it is like making Jason or Michael Myers wear a different mask for the sake of someone feeling it made a better point or seemed more “correct” Same with the voice. I understand that may be more of what a burn victim would sound like but I’m sorry I’m not hip on this 2010 Freddy but that is just me.

Like I said Britt I respect what you have to say and your opinion but maybe you are a little bit more open minded about this movie than I was and maybe you just liked it more than I did. Some people like apples some people like potatoes.

Shannon, I do believe most of the actors were bad, but Jackie Earle Haley was fantastic, and I think Kyle Gallner was the only talented kid in that bunch. I liked the face, personally. It looked like a real burn victim. Freddy was supposed to be a burn victim, and the old Elm Street films could never achieve that look. The reason his voice sounds weird? If someone’s face/body were burned that bad, their vocal chords would be restrained and afflicted. Hence, the weird voice that sounds like he’s got cotton in his throat. To me, it makes sense.

First off Bianca that is awsome! Anyone who at 5 says they want to name their first born Freddy is A-ok in my book haha, and the fact that you got a signed Robert Englund poster….NEVER tell me where you live because i’m taking that ninja style.

As far as the movie goes. The best way I can describe my feelings towards it was just “meh”. I mean I really feel like Michael Bay did what Michael Bay does. He relys alot on CGI and wow factor. I too found the fact that they changed some of the back story around odd, and I really did not like the look of Freddy’s face, his voice really annoyed me, and they did not really have a good grasp on how to make Freddy the witty character that he is and because of that I feel he kinda came off as cheesy.

I thought the acting was really bad to the point that it was hard to sit through at times, although, I do think Jakie Earle Haley did a good job. Also, I will admit I had a really hard time getting into the movie until the last 20 minutes. That started to grab my attention and I think some of it was well excecuted. However, I shouldn’t have to sit through a movie for 2 hours only to be wowed by the last 20 minutes.

So ya like I said Meh, but I will agree I’m glad it wasn’t better than the first so I guess in that sense it did it’s purpose. It really annoys me that alot of these directors don’t get that these movies worked and are loved because they are nostalgic to a time period, and no matter what your budget is you can’t recreate that so stop trying.

Nancy, I’m not going to lie, I’m really not that open minded I just went for the Cherry Coke and Sour Patch Kids, the rest was just background noise. That’s cool that your daughter was an extra though!